[31]                             home                             [33]

 

Thursday, March 16, 2006

 

Challenge problem à

The Taos Discussion à

Key-less Hash table à

The Second School of Semantic Science

 

ontologyMapping Glass Bead Games

 

 

 

Research note,

 

I developed two papers in 1999 to help me remember some work that I did in a study (and coding) of all compression algorithms.  I was programming a parallel C construction to reside on a satellite.  Fractal compression never became part of that project because fractal compression

 

1) requires computational power to build the self similar "Iterated Function System" 

2) the compression's measure of lossless-ness is imprecise (one can pass precise tests if well defined for specific instances but there is no certain and general (simple) methodology to measure the loss and gain of information).  As in the OASIS 2004 Business Centric Methodology (BCM)), choice points are required to reify new categorical abstractions and thus human in the loop methodology is necessary (for compression of data into information structure).

 

When is this important and what is the purpose of the information structure?  This problem of measurement is exactly the same as what we see (only partially addressed in Business Centric Methodology), and more fully addressed in an Information Structure Interpretation Environment proposed by the second school. 

 

In the possible ISIE standard, we would have the observation of co-occurrence of invariances in data element usage in blueprints selected for use between business partners.  The data compression (into categoricalAbstraction) follows intuitions similar to those expressed by Azamat, Ballard, Klausner and others.

 

 

 

The two papers are on:

 

similarity

 

http://www.bcngroup.org/area1/similarity.htm

 

and

 

memory

 

http://www.bcngroup.org/area1/memory.htm   .

 

 

 

 

This work was before my second round of collaboration on the Hilbert engine. 

 

http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/nationalDebate/sixtysix.htm

 

 

This second round lead to three significant developments:

 

1) work with Don Mitchell on the knowledge operating system (a concept that Don had developed before we meet).  Some aspects of the KOS was first realized in the SLIP browsers.  This realization was incomplete because Don and I ran out of funds.

 

http://www.ontologystream.com/cA/index.htm

 

 

2) work with Nathan Einwechter on the categorical abstraction of pattern invarance and the expression of this invariance into Orbs (Ontology referential bases).

 

http://www.ontologystream.com/aSLIP/index1.htm

 

This work was influenced by my effort on the CCM patents owned by Applied Technical Systems

 

http://www.ontologystream.com/OS/CCM/reificationProcesses.htm

 

 

 

3) The BCNGroup Roadmap for Semantic Technology Adoption

 

http://www.datawarehouse.com/search/?FREETXT=Prueitt

 

 

The development of an OASIS standard for "compression of data into information structure" is now possible.  Ballard's work on n-ary representation of information structure is relevant.