Home Link
Back to Index



On Creating a Software Product based on the Lifting Pedagogy,
Contextual Considerations Part I

Saturday Oct 25th, 2008


"Regarding college policy resulting in passing students not attending classes.  None of this is surprising to anyone.  These policies are being carried out throughout higher education systems, especially those schools whose own endowments are not sufficient to cover costs.  Without a doubt, the federal government and many private benefactors are being marketed for funding for these schools.  Retention and graduation rates are a key part of this marketing. 
 
"We recommend the development of some type of interactive courseware that may be brought online.  A contract vehicle is available that will market that type of product.  This contract vehicle is a minority owned, women owned, native American owned business, which qualifies for the highest levels of contract preference you can imagine."

Communications from "Private Commision on Rural College Practices 2008"

This communication establishes a context for the following discussion and design constraints.  The notion of a "product" has been given meaning within the supply side econmic and information markets.  If a "product" is to be designed, supply side semantics has to be adapted to support demand side learning.

The core issue has to do with ownership by the educational insitutions over the "right" to educate.  Home schooling, for example, is crimally illegal in some states, for example.  Two business contexts exists where this issue of ownership may be accomodated.  The first is the community center franchize to be located near colleges and universities accross the nation.  The second is the National Bridge Program  serving students who are graduating from college and colleges competing for student enrollments. 

Justification for a National Program

National educational policy recognizes the importance of skill remediation services for entering freshman, particularly in analytic reasoning, communication skills and common awareness of political and historic traditions.  

“This Panel, diverse in experience, expertise, and philosophy, agrees broadly that the delivery system in mathematics education—the system that translates mathematical knowledge into value and ability for the next generation—is broken and must be fixed. This is not a conclusion about teachers or school administrators, or textbooks or universities or any other single element of the system. It is about how the many parts do not now work together to achieve a result worthy of this country’s values and ambitions.”    March 2008  The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel.  [1]

It is in the strategic interest of any institution of higher learning to develop a complete solution to the remediation crisis. There is a recognized budgetary need to achieve additional recruitment and retention. There is also relevance to the mission statement of the institution. The central question to be answered with a nationally based program has to do with the capacity to solve what is now a perceived as an unsolvable problem.  The solution comes by altering the approach made to that problem, and by shifting the notion of "remediation" to "lifting pedagogy", as discussed in note 12.  <*>

In the United States, the capacity of each institution of higher learning is oriented towards a mission aligned with modernization of programs, such as a renewed focus on liberal education.  Growth industries like health care, pharmaceutical research, decentralization technology all require an increased performance at the freshman level.  However, mathematics performance from entering freshmen presents an unmet challenge.  This challenge is to be met with a comprehensive approach based on experience, system theory and learning theory.

The strategic interest of each institution of higher learning is replicated across the American educational system.  As a consequence each is in a position to take a leadership role in a number of areas.  These areas of leadership may be delineated in the CORE mission statement.  This mission statement delineates positive steps designed to enhance four CORE principles. 

1)    Celebration of Diversity:  Creating increased diversity within the college and university system
2)    Opening Access: Opening of access to all incoming freshman students to a understanding about the nature of mathematics
3)    Relevance: Restoring a sense of relevance by restructuring curriculum and expectations
4)    Excellence: Entering freshman should perceive a personal opportunity to participate in excellence

Our, proposed, CORE mission statement is to be used in initial fund raising and program development sufficient to find national recognition for leadership within the twenty-first century community of colleges and universities.   This program will be developed at one college or university while extending collaboration to more than one other institution.  The five-year plan is detailed in the last section of this paper.

Long-term funding-raising will seek traditional support from private foundations, as well a specific proposal to Congress and the White House.  The final proposal will be advanced as part of a larger consortium of community colleges, colleges and universities. 



[1]
The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
 
http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf